| 1. |
The host (Anna) welcomed the Partners, each participant introduced themselves, their institution,
and reviewed their role in the project so far. |
| 2. |
During the tour of the UAS campus the on-site participants performed some team-building activities (treasure hunt, who has asked about…?) |
| 3. |
The coordinator (Dariusz) and Anna (Project Manager) have led the discussion reviewing the project Results and evaluating their state of completion. The partners agreed the current stage
of development of the project results is satisfactory. |
| 4. |
After the break a detailed review of Project result 1 was carried out by Aleksandra. The Result
is complete in terms of content, but the Lead is still waiting for reviews to be carried out by
partners. Commented versions of Result 1 are to be sent to Alexandra till the end of July 2022.
Alexandra will implement the comments and improve the quality of Result 1 producing the final version ready for translation by the end of August. Translated versions will be ready by 15th of
September. |
| 5. |
A detailed review of Result 2 was carried out by Nebi who introduced a detailed plan for realising the aims of the Result. After a short discussion and minor modifications introduced by partners the consortium agreed on: |
|
-
Making a list of themes/topics derived from Result 1 to
be commented
on/reviewed by partners to form a topic database to be
developed into
lesson plans (Result 2 lead)
- Making a list of tools to be used by partners to
introduce gamification
elements and ICT elements to lesson plans
- Sharing templates for a lesson plan
- Choosing a template to be used in the project by
partners
- Dividing the list of topics/themes among
partners
- Partners produce 5 lesson plans each containing an
element of
gamification/ICT-based task or
tasks (quizzes, games, ICT enhanced
activities) to be piloted at the next stage of the
project.
- The lesson plans are put in OneDrive to be commented
on by other
partners
- The final version of the lesson plans is translated to
other languages
- The activities are put onto the website to be used by
students during
the lessons or individually
- The activities are translated and enhanced so that
they are accessible
for students with various
disabilities
- The lesson plans are piloted by partners, evaluated by
teachers and
students
- Piloting reports are sent to UAS in Tarnow
- Preparing the final Result 2 report for evaluation |
| 6. |
A
brief review of Result 3 was carried out by Anna. The
choice of the content and the app will be made after the
division of topics and making decisions on the choice of
tools for the lesson plans fitted into Result 2. |
| 7. |
Anna
introduced partners to the Tech-game website www.tech-game.anstar.edu.pl |
| 8. |
Partners
reviewed their dissemination activities. More
dissemination activities were planned. |
| 9. |
Anna
explained the need to update the timesheets and the way
the Excel timesheets work. A timesheet template, an
example of a filled in timesheet and a document showing
how to fill it in will be uploaded into the project
OneDrive |
| 10. |
A
review of the decisions taken on the previous day was
carried out. A table with a summary of (deadlines and)
actions was produced |
|
1. |
Commented
versions of Result 1 are to be sent to Alexandra |
|
2. |
Final
version of Result 1 after implementing the
corrections |
|
3. |
Translation
of Result 1 |
|
4. |
Making
a list of themes/topics derived from Result 1 to be
commented on/reviewed by partners to form a topic
database to be developed into lesson plans (Result 2
lead) |
|
5. |
Making
a list of tools to be used by partners to introduce
gamification elements and ICT elements to lesson plans |
|
6. |
Sharing
templates for a lesson plan |
|
7. |
Choosing
a template to be used in the project by partners |
|
8. |
Dividing
the list of topics/themes among partners |
|
9. |
Producing
5 lesson plans each containing an element of
gamification/ICT-based task or tasks (quizzes, games,
ICT enhanced activities) to be piloted at the next stage
of the project |
|
10. |
The
lesson plans are put in OneDrive to be commented on by
other partners |
|
11. |
The
comments to the lesson plans in OneDrive are uploaded to
the Drive by partners |
|
12. |
The
final version of the lesson plans is uploaded to
OneDrive |
|
13. |
The
final version of the lesson plans is translated to other
languages |
|
14. |
The
ICT/gamified activities in all language versions are put
onto the website and enhanced so that they are
accessible for students with various disabilities |
|
15. |
The
lesson plans are put onto the website to be used by
teachers of history |
|
16. |
The
lesson plans are piloted by partners, evaluated by
teachers and students |
|
17. |
Piloting
reports are sent to UAS in Tarnow |
|
18. |
Preparing
the final Result 2 report for evaluation |
|
19. |
Improving
the lesson plans in accordance with the results of
piloting |
| 11. |
The
C1 Joint Staff Training was discussed. |
|
a. |
Nebi
suggested moving the training to Turkey to relieve the
Macedonian Partner facing temporary understaffing
because due to health problems of their staff. The
consortium agreed. Anna to check with the Polish NA if
it is fine with them. |
|
b. |
The
Macedonian partner and the Turkish partner will develop
a list of competencies to be enhanced during the
training and the training agenda. |
|
c. |
The
date of the training to be determined before the
September VPM |
|
d. |
The
next VPM will happen in September as usual on the second
Wednesday 13.00 CET. Anna will be available on the
second Wednesday of August at 13.00 CET if any partners
need consultations. |
|
Akademia
Nauk Stosowanych W Tarnowie, Anna Stefanowicz-Kocol |
